Can English Journals Have Dual Corresponding Authors?
In the academic publishing world, it is common for research articles to have a singular corresponding author who takes responsibility for the manuscript and serves as the main point of contact between the reviewers, editors, and journal staff. However, there is a growing trend that questions whether English journals can allow for dual corresponding authors. In other words, can two or more authors share the role of being the primary contact for a research article? This article will explore the advantages, challenges, and possibilities of having dual corresponding authors in English journals.
Traditionally, having a single corresponding author has been the norm, as it simplifies communication and streamlines the process. However, as research collaborations become increasingly common, having a joint authority can better represent the collaborative effort involved in a study. By including multiple corresponding authors, it becomes possible to acknowledge the contributions of each individual involved more accurately. This can be particularly beneficial in interdisciplinary studies where researchers from different disciplines collaborate, each bringing their unique expertise.
One advantage of having dual corresponding authors is that it fosters a sense of equality and fairness within the research team. Often, research articles have multiple authors who have made significant contributions to the study. However, only one author is recognized as the corresponding author, which may lead to an uneven distribution of credit. By allowing multiple corresponding authors, the recognition is shared equally among all individuals involved, enhancing transparency and fairness.
Additionally, including multiple corresponding authors can facilitate better communication and support for readers and reviewers. If a research article involves complex methodologies or highly specialized knowledge, having multiple points of contact can help address inquiries more efficiently. In cases where authors are located in different time zones or have different expertise, readers and reviewers can benefit from a faster and more comprehensive response. This can ultimately lead to improved understanding and engagement with the research.
However, there are challenges associated with having dual corresponding authors in English journals. One of the main concerns is potential confusion about which author is responsible for particular aspects of the manuscript. It is crucial to establish a clear division of responsibilities to prevent miscommunication or instances where no author takes ownership of certain tasks. Additionally, guidelines and instructions for submitting research articles may need to be revised to accommodate the inclusion of multiple corresponding authors.
Despite these challenges, there are already examples of English journals embracing the idea of dual corresponding authors. Some journals have introduced specific guidelines and templates to support the inclusion of multiple corresponding authors in research articles. This progressive approach acknowledges the evolving nature of academic research and the importance of collaborative efforts in advancing knowledge.
In conclusion, while the traditional model of a single corresponding author remains prevalent in English journals, the concept of having dual corresponding authors is gradually gaining attention. By allowing for joint authority, recognition is shared more equitably, fostering collaboration, and promoting transparency. With clear guidelines and effective communication channels, the challenges associated with dual corresponding authors can be overcome, propelling the academic publishing world into a more inclusive and collaborative future.